Firstly, before you watch this, you need to understand one very important thing:
It. Is. Not. The. Movie!
I knew that before I started watching it. And all throughout people kept posting things on Facebook like, "They completely ruined a beloved story! How could they change it like this?" or "This is not the Sound of Music, they've completely rewritten it!"
Now, now. Maybe you might want to do some research before posting things that make you sound rude, and quite frankly...ignorant. (Sorry, but it does.)
This version of The Sound of Music is the Broadway Musical. NOT the Julie Andrews movie version. And, like any stage performance of ANY musical (look at every high school across the country) things are going to be a little different from that last time you saw it on stage. That happens to be the director's prerogative.
Now, I'm not saying that you are not allowed to dislike the interpretation of it. But you should recognize that it IS the Broadway musical version and actually hasn't been "rewritten" or "changed" in any major way.
Next up: The Acting
I was actually underwhelmed with Carrie Underwood's acting. At first I chalked it up to her, well, not being an actress. She's a singer above all else. But then a friend pointed out to me that she was in a movie called "Soul Surfer" and was actually good. Which I agree with. Then, my sister pointed out that she had been trained to keep a neutral accent so that her cute country twang wouldn't come through...
So that got me thinking.
I've been on stage before and in front of a camera and believe it or not, your acting does change.
Let me explain.
When acting out a scene live on stage in front of an audience, you're often told to "act to the person in the last row of the theater". And for some theaters, that is pretty dang far. So you project EVERYTHING. But you have to find the balance between too much and not enough. Switch the audience for a camera, and you start "camera acting" (that's just what I call it). So now you have a stage, but you're acting to a camera instead of people. With camera acting, you can't be as big without looking silly. Cameras can see a tiny little smile, whereas the person at the WAY BACK probably missed it. But what about her acting in the movie? Well, she wasn't on a stage like she was for the Sound of Music. A sound stage/lot/location is very different from a stage that they filmed TSoM on.
I know Carrie Underwood can act, I've seen it. But it was in a different medium where she probably didn't have to consciously hide her accent (and if she did, they could just re-shoot the scene if need be). That on top of being LIVE and on a different kind of set, I think, threw her acting a bit. However, it wasn't completely unbearable. I've seen worse. I've seen better but I've definitely seen worse.
Basically, what I'm trying to say is that there is a difference and it takes training to switch from one medium to the other and then find a balance of the two. It's hard and I think you'd be surprised to know how hard it can be.
There were also other actors who could've been better. But actually, the more I think about this, the more I like it. Why? Because it was truly raw. Not "filmed to feel raw and real" but actually raw and real. The acting wasn't perfect. Some actors were over reaching while others were bland. The singing was up and down. Some actor's could get the notes others were slightly flat-even from song to song the actor's weren't perfect. And I'm grateful for it. WHY?? Because how many times a day do we hear about how Hollywood projects this idea of perfection to the world? That you must sing perfectly, act perfectly, look perfect. How many times does Hollywood actually allow for imperfections? Not often.
And another thing. Take a second to think about the last time you thought about TV and went, "Nope, no way am I turning on the TV just to let worldly ideals come into my home." Hmm? Where was the "bad message" in this show? Perfect? No, it was by far not perfect. But was it something that I would let my kids watch (if I had them)? Yes. Would I feel comfortable watching it with my husband, my parents, my in-laws etc? Yes. It may have been a one time thing, and I may have access to the movie version but this was TV. Do you think a child watching this would walk away grumbling about how bad the acting was or how some people couldn't seem to find their notes? Me thinks not.
The message is still there. The beloved characters and music is all still there. You can still enjoy this version of the musical if you let yourself. If all you look for is the imperfection, that is all you will see and you won't be able to truly enjoy the show. But if you understand that it won't be perfect bu that it's still that story you loved as a child, then you might actually enjoy it.
And maybe I'm wrong. Maybe, you'll hate it no matter what. But I suppose now you'll at least have another opinion to consider.
Oh. One more thing. I've always REALLY DISLIKED "Climb Every Mountain". Audra McDonald completely changed my mind about it. I LOVE her version. Her passion and her meaning behind singing those words absolutely came through and I cried. It was beautiful.
So, there you go. Go see for yourself what you think about it. And if it leaves you with a sour taste in your mouth go see Disney's Frozen because it will melt your heart and you will walk out of the theater will all sorts of warm fuzzies.
































